On 22/09/10 3:21 PM, "Mikael Abrahamsson" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Sep 2010, Hesham Soliman wrote:
>
>> I agree. You want this "minor" change to be done in all host stacks. At this
>> stage IMO it's way too late. I'm dealing with some vendors now and I don't
>> hear any complaints about supporting ND in their routers/switches, that's
>> anecdotal but we didn't see this on the mailing list either. I can't see how
>> ND is a show-stopper or even delaying any router vendor.
>
> ND is an integral part in any IPv6 implementation. Nobody is saying ND
> shold go away, what we're saying is that it should be possible to run
> without it in some scenarios.
=> I understand that, but I think that to make this work you will need to do
that with zero modifications to the host's IPv6 stack. I don't think you can
count on people modifying their host implementations to support this
scenario.
Hesham
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
