I support this as well. /Olivier
> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Joel M. Halpern > Sent: Sunday, October 10, 2010 4:01 AM > To: Brian Haberman > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Call for Adoption:draft-kohno-ipv6-prefixlen-p2p-03.txt > > Yes, we should adopt this document as a working group document. > I hope that we can quickly complete work on this document. > > Yours, > Joel > > On 10/9/2010 12:39 PM, Brian Haberman wrote: > > All, > > I am starting a one week consensus call on adopting: > > > > Title : Using 127-bit IPv6 Prefixes on Inter-Router Links > > Author(s) : M. Kohno, et al. > > Filename : draft-kohno-ipv6-prefixlen-p2p-03.txt > > Pages : 9 > > Date : 2010-10-09 > > > > as a 6MAN WG document. Please state your opinion (positive or > negative) > > on the mailing list or to the WG chairs. This call will end on > October > > 15, 2010. > > > > Regards, > > Brian & Bob > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > > [email protected] > > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > [email protected] > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
