Hi Mahesh, Let's imagine that we introduce these two new protocols. Would it be easier to implement them as IP4/IP6 dual stack? The complet socket interface should be rewriten at least....
We have already enough pains - probably it is less work to implement IPv6 "as it is" than to intruduce two "mixed solutions", Géza On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 12:00 AM, Mahesh Govindappa <[email protected] > wrote: > Hi, > > > > I was thinking that why can’t we have a 2 different protocol types. > > > > 1. Where src address is ipv4 and dst as ipv6 address. > > 2. Where src is ipv6 and dst as ipv4 address. > > > > We name a different protocol number for each of them and have a different > treatment when it comes to application level and in routers. > > Let me know if that is a good idea. > > > > Thanks > > Mahesh G > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > [email protected] > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > >
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
