Hi, I think this draft is looking good. A couple of points:
> 2.1.3. Deprecated addresses in the policy table > > IPv4-compatible IPv6 address is deprecated. [RFC4291] IPv6 site- > local unicast address is deprecated. [RFC3879] Moreover, 6bone > testing address was [RFC3701] The issue is how we treat these > outdated addresses. The sentence about 6bone is incomplete. I think the answer for 6bone is that 3ffe::/16 is just another reserved unicast prefix now, but it may be allocated one day. So why list it at all? It's just part of 2000::/3 now. The only exception might be 3ffe:831f::/32. That was used as an experimental Teredo prefix, so it might be wise to list it with low precedence. But even that could cause a problem many years from now, when 3ffe::/16 is assigned as unicast space. For the other deprecated addresses, listing them with low precedence seems correct. > 5.1. Normative References It seems to me that very few of the references are actually normative. Most of them should be moved to "Informative". Regards Brian Carpenter -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
