Bob, Brian, I'd like to push back on this consensus call. I am currently -1 on it. Questions on the requirements, scope of solution, as well as its present validity were raised and unanswered, in some cases totally, in others incompletely or incoherently:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/current/msg12986.html http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/current/msg12993.html Summary of the problems: - Requirements: Unarticulated in terms of why IETF standard track solutions acceptable in similar deployments are not acceptable in this case. - Requirements: The Solution attributes to the access node very distinct IP interface, forwarding and processing capabilities, which was said to be previously unacceptable - Critical state and failure modes un-addressed, no smaller in consequence to the ones that resulted in draft -07 not being accepted. - ICMPv6 (RS) signalling is being (ab)used for line state signalling. Likely overlap and conflict with other IETF WGs. Thanks, Woj. On 28 October 2010 22:53, Bob Hinden <[email protected]> wrote: > All, > > The chairs believe there is a consensus to adopt this document as a 6man > working group document. The next version will be published as a w.g. > document. > > We also note that there are still open issues that need to be resolved > before we could start a w.g. last call. > > Thanks for all the feedback on this work. > > Regards, > > Bob & Brian > > On Oct 22, 2010, at 8:01 AM, Bob Hinden wrote: > > > Correction: The consensus call will end on October 28, 2010. > > > > Bob > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Bob Hinden <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> 6MAN WG, > >> > >> This is a consensus call on adopting: > >> > >> Title : Line identification in IPv6 Router Solicitation > >> messages > >> Author(s) : S. Krishnan, et al. > >> Filename : draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-08.txt > >> Pages : 9 > >> Date : 2010-09-20 > >> > >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-08 > >> > >> as a 6MAN working group document. The authors believe this version > resolves issues raised on the mailing list in the last consensus call. > >> > >> Please state your opinion, positive or negative, on the mailing or to > the chairs. This consensus call will end on October 18, 2010. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Bob & Brian > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > [email protected] > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- >
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
