On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 20:58:39 -0500, Steven Blake wrote: > This does not address Ran's comment: why would we ever need a new > extension header? Why aren't the Hop-by-Hop Options and Destination > Options extension headers sufficient? Neither of the drafts above motivate > this need.
Tunnel specific extension header, efficient low overhead extension header, ... whatever. The current extension header mechanism isn't practical, but why should we wipe out these extension header at all? Introduce GIEH as a generic container and everything is fine. Hagen -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
