I agree with the prior comment that the document should explicitly state that it obsoletes RFC 3627 and updates RFC 4291. Otherwise, I support advancing the doc.

On 11/18/2010 7:34 PM, Bob Hinden wrote:
All,

This message starts a 6MAN Working Group Last Call on advancing:

        Title           : Using 127-bit IPv6 Prefixes on Inter-Router Links
        Author(s)       : M. Kohno, et al.
        Filename        : draft-ietf-6man-prefixlen-p2p-00.txt
        Pages           : 9
        Date            : 2010-10-15

        http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6man-prefixlen-p2p-00

as a Proposed Standard.  Substantive comments and statements of support for 
advancing this document should be directed to the mailing list.  Editorial 
suggestions can be sent to the authors.  This last call will end on December 6, 
2010.

Regards,
Bob Hinden&  Brian Haberman
6MAN Chairs

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

--
Ed Jankiewicz - SRI International
Fort Monmouth Branch Office - IPv6 Research
Supporting DISA Standards Engineering Branch
732-389-1003 or  [email protected]

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to