On Jan 3, 2011, at 5:20 AM, Suresh Krishnan wrote: > a) Specifying a uniform format for all future IPv6 extension headers to > make them easier to parse/process.
Support > b) Requesting a single IP protocol number codepoint for all future > extension headers and multiplexing them using a Specific Type field > inside the generic header. Object: We have not demonstrated necessity. > c) Specifying error-handling and drop behavior for dealing with unknown > extension headers. This turns out to be a corollary of a), so I support this as well. Once you say that things are a TLV, the behavior should be obvious to one skilled in the art. Tony -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
