Hi Karl,
  The solicited node multicast address is just a pre-filter. Any collision that 
will be detected with your proposed 32 bit solicited node multicast address 
will also be detected with a 24 bit solicited node multicast address. How many 
nodes do you expect to have on your link?

Cheers
Suresh

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
> Behalf Of Karl Auer
> Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2011 3:59 AM
> To: IETF IPv6
> Subject: question about solicited node multicast addresses
> 
> How come solicited node multicast addresses use only 24 bits 
> of the host's IPv6 address? It looks like there is space for 
> many more; 64 more at a pinch. Using more bits from the host 
> address would decrease even further the likelihood of two 
> nodes sharing the same SNM address.
> 
> See RFC 4291, section 2.7.1, page 16.
> 
> I can see why at least one bit is needed to discriminate 
> between all-nodes and SNM addresses[1], but why use so many bits (8)?
> 
> The only plausible theory I have is that after 8 bits of "ff" 
> and 16 bits of ethernet multicast prefix (0x3333) are 
> factored in, there is only room at layer 2 for 24 more bits, 
> so there is no point having more bits in layer 3. This is not 
> a satisfying theory because it appears to tie layer 3 
> multicast to a specific layer 2 technology (ethernet, with 
> its 48-bit MAC addresses).
> 
> Regards, K.
> 
> [1] All-nodes L2 multicast                   33:33:00:00:00:01
>     SNM L2 multicast of 2001:db8:100:200::1  33:33:ff:00:00:01
>     SNM L2 with 32 bits instead of 24 bits   33:33:00:00:00:01
> 
> --
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ~~~~~~~~~
> Karl Auer ([email protected])                   +61-2-64957160 (h)
> http://www.biplane.com.au/kauer/                   
> +61-428-957160 (mob)
> 
> GPG fingerprint: DA41 51B1 1481 16E1 F7E2 B2E9 3007 14ED 5736 
> F687 Old fingerprint: B386 7819 B227 2961 8301 C5A9 2EBC 754B 
> CD97 0156
> 
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to