On Mar 3, 2011, at 2:10 PM, TJ wrote: > > As 3177-bis says, the IETF has no control over how service providers hand out > IPv6 address space. From what I've been reading in the past few years, it > looks like at least some providers are planning to give /64s to customers. > > Really? None of the ISPs I have spoken with, and certainly none of the ones > I have worked with, are following a /64 per client plan. I have discussed > /48s vs /56s vs /60s ... but never a /64. If you know of any /64ers, please > name-and-shame them - or atleast push them to start thinking more clearly!
Here is a Reddit commenter from Canada who claims to have been delegated a native /64 prefix by some unnamed service provider: <http://www.reddit.com/r/ipv6/comments/fvvh9/i_am_a_verizon_fios_customerwhen_can_i_get_on_ipv6/c1j10sy> Not sure how credible that claim can be regarded, but it's a claim that can be checked. -- james woodyatt <[email protected]> member of technical staff, core os networking -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
