On May 13, 2011, at 11:34 , Cameron Byrne wrote:
> On May 13, 2011 11:28 AM, "james woodyatt" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Mobile hosts SHOULD implement DHCPv6 clients.
> > I wouldn't oppose elevating the requirement further still to say that
> > mobile hosts MUST implement DHCPv6 clients.
>
> Why? Most mobile v6 nodes do not support it today. [...]
I was thinking about RFC 3775, section 11.5.2, which says:
As described in Section 4, in order to form a new care-of address, a
mobile node MAY use either stateless [13] or stateful (e.g., DHCPv6
[29]) Address Autoconfiguration.
--
james woodyatt <[email protected]>
member of technical staff, core os networking
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
