I do not support this draft too.
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Christian Huitema" <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, May 22, 2011 12:03 PM
To: "Brian Haberman" <[email protected]>; "IPv6 WG Mailing List"
<[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Consensus call on adopting: draft-hartmann-6man-addressnaming
This starts a 2-week consensus call on adopting ...
draft-hartmann-6man-addresspartnaming-01.txt
as a 6MAN WG document. Please state your opinion (either for or
against) on making this draft a WG draft either on the mailing list or to
the chairs. This call will end on May 1, 2011.
I do not support adoption of this document as a work item. There is no
pressing problem to solve there. The working group has more urgent work to
do than wasting time on this subject, and we really don't need to impose
some "name correctness tax" on the authors of future drafts.
-- Christian Huitema
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------