On 06/01/2011 02:13 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > In summary: the algorithm suggested in the Appendix to > draft-ietf-6man-flow-3697bis-04 doesn't perform very well > on real packets, and I have an improved version to suggest.
Sorry if I'm missing something: Any reasons for which you chose a different algorithm from the one described in draft-gont-6man-flowlabel-security? The algorithm in the aforementioned I-D has already been well tested for randomizing TCP port numbers, timestamps, and sequence numbers. -- and I don't think there's a real need to reinvent the wheel. Thanks, -- Fernando Gont e-mail: [email protected] || [email protected] PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1 -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
