For the AD's information - the suggested hash algorithm in Appendix A definitely needs to be revised. It isn't normative so it can be taken care of a little later, along with any AD comments.
Regards Brian Carpenter On 2011-06-07 02:37, Brian Haberman wrote: > Jari & Ralph, > On behalf of the 6MAN Working Group, the chairs request the > advancement of: > > Title : IPv6 Flow Label Specification > Author(s) : Shane Amante > Brian Carpenter > Sheng Jiang > Jarno Rajahalme > Filename : draft-ietf-6man-flow-3697bis-04.txt > Pages : 15 > Date : 2011-05-12 > > as a Proposed Standard. The Working Group Last Call ended on April 1, > 2011 and this version addresses all comments/issues raised. > > Regards, > Brian Haberman & Bob Hinden > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > [email protected] > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
