On Wed, 22 Jun 2011, Ted Lemon wrote:
On Jun 22, 2011, at 7:41 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
I agree, that's the deployment model I advocate for hostile scenarios. Use
DHCPv6 for stateful addressing, advertise default GW via RA, don't advertise
any on-link prefix, and make sure hosts can't L2 communicate at all with each
other by means of enforcement in switches (or just separate them into different
L2 domains).
Huh. If I had a choice between RA and multicast, I think I'd choose
multicast. When you have to utterly cripple your technology in order to
continue using a protocol, I think it's time to ask whether or not the
protocol you're using is the right protocol at all.
Could you please rephrase the above, I don't understand. Protocol?
--
Mikael Abrahamsson email: [email protected]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
