On Sat, 2011-07-02 at 14:39 -0400, RJ Atkinson wrote: > On 2nd July 2011, Karl Auer wrote, in part: > > It seems strange to me that we define "IPv6 Extension Headers", > > then refuse to allow any further extensions! > > Kindly note that this document does NOT prohibit future IPv6 extensions. > That is a mis-understanding of this document.
I was not taking issue with the document, I was just commenting on your assertion that it would be "highly undesirable" to create more extension headers. Sorry to have been unclear about that. Regards, K. -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Karl Auer ([email protected]) +61-2-64957160 (h) http://www.biplane.com.au/kauer/ +61-428-957160 (mob) GPG fingerprint: DA41 51B1 1481 16E1 F7E2 B2E9 3007 14ED 5736 F687 Old fingerprint: B386 7819 B227 2961 8301 C5A9 2EBC 754B CD97 0156
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
