Hi Thiruma, The packet capture looks good. I did not get the question however.
If there is a question on technology you can mail me, however if the question is on an implementation we can take it offline. Thanks, Vishwas On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 5:43 AM, Thiruma valavan <[email protected]>wrote: > Vishwas, > > I am having one more doubt in IPv6 Fragmentation > > Router Interface MTU 1500, Host A wants to send a packet with 3,000 data > bytes but MTU is 1500, so it needs to fragment the packet. > > As per RFC 2460, First Packet 40 bytes (IPv6 Header) + 8 bytes Fragment > Header + 1452 Data = 1500 > > Second Packet 40 bytes (IPv6 Header) + 8 bytes Fragment Header > + 1452 Data = 1500 > > Third Packet 40 bytes (IPv6 Header) + 8 bytes > Fragment Header + 96 Data = 1500 > > > > > > > > Thanks, > Thiru > > > > ------------------------------ > Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2011 15:05:47 -0700 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: Doubt in Router Advertisement Message > > Hi Thiruma, > > From the specs it is clear that the MTU is optional. However if MTU sending > is enabled it should be sent on change too. > > Sounds like a bug in the implementation to me. > > Thanks, > Vishwas > > > > Sent from my Palm Pre on AT&T > > ------------------------------ > On Jul 9, 2011 2:51 AM, Thiruma valavan <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi IETF Group, > > While testing IPV6 Router Advertisement part, I noticed some behaviour that > if I changed router interface MTU value, it won't send Router Advertisement > message immediately instead of waiting to next interval time. > > Is that normal behaviour, > > Thanks & Regards, > Thirumavalavan P > Calsoflabs India Pvt Ltd,Bangalore > ATLEN Group of Company > Mob: +91 9790758035 >
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
