"Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <[email protected]> wrote:
|The 'only' advantage of ULA vs. GUA is ease of filtering on a very short and
well-known prefix.
Well, the other advantage is cost, and that's exactly why we will likely
never have useful centrally allocated ULAs. If the ULAs were cheap they
would represent a threat to the global address price structure and that
just isn't going to happen. If the ULAs cost as much as (potentially)
routable global address space it will be worth the trouble (in most cases)
to jump through whatever hoops are required to justify the allocation of
the latter.
Dan Lanciani
ddl@danlan.*com
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
