On 2011-09-28 21:42, François-Xavier Le Bail wrote: ... > > So, if the RFC 3484, Section 4 "Candidate Source Addresses" is involved in > the reply to datagrams sent to an anycast address, it might be useful to > reassess the restrictions that excluded an anycast address from the > "candidate set", at least for the replies.
You would need to start a thread proposing a specific change to draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise if you want this to be done. I'm not convinced; as Ole said, anycast remains a special case for certain applications, so it will be hard to define a safe general rule. Brian -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
