This is precisely the question that I and Bernie Volz asked a year or
two back.  Similarly when it was discussed to add a DNS option to the
IPv6 ND RA when the DNS option was already supported by DHCPv6.  The
question was if the receiving node gets the same information from two
different sources, which information wins? What if one information was
fat-fingered at the SP provisioning system while the other was not?  We
should look at the RFC that added the DNS option to the RA and see if
that RFC has a section regarding this question and we could copy that
guidance.

Hemant

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
Wes Beebee (wbeebee)
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2011 1:52 PM
To: Brian Haberman; IPv6 WG Mailing List
Cc: [email protected]; Bob Hinden; [email protected]
Subject: Re: Review requested: draft-ietf-mif-dhcpv6-route-option

What happens when both RA and DHCPv6 are configured?

- Wes

On 10/28/11 9:11 AM, "Brian Haberman" <[email protected]> wrote:

> All,
>      The MIF WG is currently defining a DHCPv6 option for defining
> routes (including default routes) on client nodes.  Please review the
> draft and provide any feedback you have.
> 
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mif-dhcpv6-route-option-03
> 
> Regards,
> Brian
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> [email protected]
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to