In message <1321243491.2514.99.camel@karl>, Karl Auer writes:
> On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 14:27 +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:
> > Anyone depending apon search lists that they did not set already
> > has a broken configuration.
> 
> I didn't say people should do these things, just that there are things
> that *can be* delivered via RA and that *can be* delivered via DHCP, and
> that *can conflict*.
> 
> If things do conflict, then something has to decide, on some criterion
> or other, which to honour (or to honour neither of course).
> 
> My post was in answer to a question from someone about about how things
> could conflict. That's all.
> 
> > Enterprises MAY advertise a search lists when configuring their own
> > machines.  Homes MAY advertise a search lists when configuring their
> > own machines.
> 
> Well - yes. And if their DHCP server says one thing and their RAs are
> saying another, then there should be a sane default for deciding which
> to use. That's all this is about.

Just let implementations pick one and stick with it until it changes.
Difference *will* occur as a matter of operational practice whenever
the list is changed so this isn't a error condition unless it
continues for a long time.  If you update the DHCP server the RA
will be out of date.  If you update the RA first the DHCP server
will be out of date.

> Regards, K.
> =20
> --=20
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Karl Auer ([email protected])                   +61-2-64957160 (h)
> http://www.biplane.com.au/kauer/                   +61-428-957160 (mob)
> 
> GPG fingerprint: DA41 51B1 1481 16E1 F7E2 B2E9 3007 14ED 5736 F687
> Old fingerprint: B386 7819 B227 2961 8301 C5A9 2EBC 754B CD97 0156
> 
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: [email protected]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to