On 2011-12-09 03:46, Brian Haberman wrote:
> Brian & Bob,
...
>> This document describes how the Zone Identifier of an IPv6 scoped
>> address can be represented in a Uniform Resource Identifier that
>> includes a literal IPv6 address. It updates RFC 3986 and RFC 4007.
>
> If option 2 is preferred as this work moves forward, does there need to
> be text on how to handle the addition of a ZoneID to an address that
> does not need one (i.e., non-link-local)?
Either that, or at least a statement that it's currently undefined.
I imagine that MIF might have an interest in this question.
>
> It would probably be useful for the draft to reference RFC 4007 as
> guidance on how the ZoneID affects interface/address selection.
Yes, good idea.
Thanks
Brian C
>
> Regards,
> Brian
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> [email protected]
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
