Hi, > Different operators have different requirements and preferences based on > their environments. I have seen deployments where SLAAC is much more useful > than DHCPv6. I've seen deployments where DHCPv6 is needed. So both have a > place and we should let the operators decide what they want to use. > Environments with 4 to 20 devices in them (small businesses) may not want the > complexity of setting up a central server. Those environments are probably > more suited for SLAAC.
SLAAC + Stateless DHCPv6. I agree that a central Stateful DHCPv6 server is too complex for such a situation, but come on: a stateless DHCPv6 server is simple…. - Sander -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
