On 5. Jan 2012, at 09:32 , Florian Weimer wrote: > * Fernando Gont: > >> b) Processing of atomic fragments as non-fragmented traffic. > > Is this even possible? The presence of an additional extension header > necessarily triggers additional packet processing, doesn't it?
What he means is remove the fragment header in this case without any other fragment code processing and continue handling the packet as if you'd have received it without the ext hdr. That this is still an expensive operation for a silly packet does not seem to trickle down so avoiding these cases whenever possible should be the rule. /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions! It does not matter how good you are. It matters what good you do! -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
