In message <[email protected]>, Doug Barton writes: > On 01/05/2012 14:54, Fernando Gont wrote: > > On 01/05/2012 07:45 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > >> > Steinar wrote that atomic fragments break FreeBSD 7.4 (and there might > >> > be others, of course). Not sending them breaks important transition > >> > technology. > > > > Looks like FreeBSD should patch. :-) > > FYI, FreeBSD 7.4 is the last release of the 7.x branch, and was released > almost a year ago. It's scheduled to EOL in a little more than a year. > > It would be much more interesting to know if the bug is still present in > the stable/8 branch (which will see at least one more release) or more
The bug is still in 8 stable: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/stable/8/sys/netinet/ipfw/ip_fw2.c?view=log > importantly, in the about-to-be-released 9.0. It's fixed in 9 stable. > Doug > > -- > > You can observe a lot just by watching. -- Yogi Berra > > Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. > Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/ > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > [email protected] > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: [email protected] -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
