I on the other hand, as a more naive reader, find the update useful to
understanding.
On 18/01/2012 9:04 AM, Thomas Narten wrote:
I am curious as to what others think about this.
IMO, we are discussing trivialities, not something rising to the level
of needing an errata or worth spending any more of our time on.
Thomas
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
