Fernando,
On 3/27/12 8:57 AM, Fernando Gont wrote:
Folks,
I think that one error in which we have incurred at least in the couple
of years (myself included) is that we focus our discussion on
"mac-derived addresses vs privacy addresses" when the question should
really be about "stable addresses vs. temporary addresses".
Given that the question is being driven by the work going into 3484bis,
I disagree. The question I asked is querying people's choice for
preferring temporary (RFC 4941) addresses over public addresses when
performing address selection.
The discussion of defining a new form of stable address as opposed to
the current EUI-64-derived addressing is a separate topic. This is
especially relevant given the state of 3484bis (ready for WGLC).
Regards,
Brian
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
