On 3/29/12 8:52 AM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
On 29 Mar 2012, at 14:15 , Brian Haberman wrote:
It is not an assumption, it is stately quite clearly in the Scoped
Addressing Architecture (RFC 4007). From Section 5 :
A zone of a given scope (less than global) falls completely within
zones of larger scope. That is, a smaller scope zone cannot
include more topology than would any larger scope zone with which
it shares any links or interfaces.
Brian, Stig, thanks for the help.
Fred: I think what would be best is to define a "service provider"
scope that is smaller than global, and larger than organization.
These would be defined to be forwarded to ISPs by default, although
organizations that don't want that can always filter them at the
desired boundary.
RFC 3513 describes the multicast scopes and there are some that are not
currently defined.
Regards,
Brian
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
