Brian Carpenter writes: > > The wording I propose to add is: > > > > "There SHOULD be an administrative option to change this preference, if > > the > > implementation supports privacy addresses. If there is no such option, > > there > > MUST be an administrative option to disable privacy addresses." > > > > -Dave > > That works for me. Perhaps there also needs to be a general statement in the > security > considerations that all administrative changes and options MUST be secured > against illicit use.
Done. Draft -02 now includes the wording above, and adds a general statement in the security considerations section as you suggested. -Dave -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
