A question for the draft author: At one point you write that the intent is to replace EUI-64-based addresses (Section 5). But that doesn't seem to jibe with what you write in the intro about RFC-4941. I am concerned that adopting this mechanism will make matters worse if this mechanism is being used as an alternative to CGAs, as opposed to EUI-64s..
Eliot -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
