I strongly support the publication of this document as a proposed
standard (and the accompanying informational analysis as an
informational RFC). The analysis captures the issues, and the
modification relaxes the existing rules in important cases where it is
indeed safe to do so.
Thank you,
Joel M. Halpern
On 4/19/2012 11:40 AM, Bob Hinden wrote:
All,
This message starts a two week 6MAN Working Group on advancing:
Title : UDP Checksums for Tunneled Packets
Author(s) : Marshall Eubanks
P.F. Chimento
Filename : draft-ietf-6man-udpchecksums-02.txt
Pages : 12
Date : 2012-03-12
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6man-udpchecksums-02
as Proposed Standard. Substantive comments and statements of support for
advancing this document should be directed to the mailing list. Editorial
suggestions can be sent to the authors. This last call will end on May 3, 2012.
Regards,
Ole Troan& Bob Hinden
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
