Hi, Ole, On 04/27/2012 05:21 AM, Ole Trøan wrote: > working group, > > [changed subject] > > in the context of > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gont-6man-predictable-fragment-id-02 > any opinion on how to proceed? > > - document covering predictable values in IETF protocols in general
I don't think such a document could formally update in protocol that should be using unpredictable IDs, since the contraints are different for each protocol. > - document predictable IP ID fields in both IPv4 and IPv6 This one *could* make sense, however, the constraints are somewhat different, and procedurally-wise, it may be simpler to work on this I-D here, than having an I-D that spans 6man and intarea wg(?). > - fix the predictable fragment ID problem in IPv6 I'd obviously go with this one. > - do nothing? Hopefully not -- if we don't fix this, who would do it? -- Even vendors have been responsive to this I-D, so one would expect that we do something about it. Thanks! Best regards, -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: [email protected] PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492 -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
