It already says "Other IPv4 addresses are assigned global scope."
And since RFC 1918 addresses are treated as globals too, saying 6598 is treated
like
any other global address didn't seem necessary. Still, in response to this
email, I'm
changing to:
"Other IPv4 addresses (including IPv4 private addresses [RFC1918] and
Shared Address Space addresses [RFC6598]) are assigned global scope."
in -03, which at least makes it clear that this was intentional.
-Dave
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> George, Wes
> Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2012 8:43 AM
> To: Bob Hinden; [email protected] Mailing List
> Subject: RE: 6MAN WG Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484bis-02.txt>
>
> Apologies on missing the cutoff, but I made the recommendation at the mic in
> Paris that this needed to say something referencing RFC 6598 and how those
> addresses are to be treated. I just got around to checking and it seems to
> have
> been missed in this revision.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Wes
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
> > Of Bob Hinden
> > Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 5:28 PM
> > To: [email protected] Mailing List
> > Cc: Bob Hinden
> > Subject: 6MAN WG Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484bis-02.txt>
> >
> > All,
> >
> > This message starts a two week 6MAN Working Group on advancing:
> >
> > Title : Default Address Selection for Internet Protocol
> > version 6 (IPv6)
> > Author(s) : Dave Thaler
> > Richard Draves
> > Arifumi Matsumoto
> > Tim Chown
> > Filename : draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484bis-02.txt
> > Pages : 30
> > Date : 2012-04-11
> >
> > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484bis-02
> >
> > as Proposed Standard. Substantive comments and statements of support
> > for advancing this document should be directed to the mailing list.
> > Editorial suggestions can be sent to the authors. This last call will
> > end on April 26, 2012.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Ole Troan & Bob Hinden
> >
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable
> proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to
> copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for
> the
> use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the
> intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any
> dissemination,
> distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and
> attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you
> have
> received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and
> permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and any printout.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> [email protected]
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
