That ambiguity around the prefix length /10 vs /64 of a link-local
address should be clarified.
If clarified, among other advantages, it would allow to write C code
which, when typing "ifconfig eth0 add fe80::1" it would know to fill in
the prefix length by itself, and not wonder about which length should it be.
Alex
Le 07/05/2012 08:56, Brian E Carpenter a écrit :
On 2012-05-07 00:59, Mark Andrews wrote:
See the nanog thread starting here:
http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2012-May/048079.html
I'm sure the intention was to reserve the entire /10 prefix but it's
correct that the RFC is not clear about this. Seems like an erratum
is needed.
Brian
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative
Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
