Randy, >>> >> It is allowed and I don't want to start a big IPR thread here, but I >> think the intent for this clause (no derivative works) is for work >> that someone wants to present to a w.g. that was not intended to be an >> IETF work item. My opinion is that it's not appropriate for documents >> intended to become an IETF work item as yours was. > > i beg to differ. i have used the restrictive clause for years exactly > as fernando states. if the wg does not adopt, then i may take *my* > marbles and go home.
Thanks for saying it so clearly. I choose to not do that as do many others. I allow my contributions to be used by others in the IETF process. Bob -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
