On 2012-05-30 02:18, Mark Andrews wrote: > In message <m2pq9msdva.wl%[email protected]>, Randy Bush writes: >>> Next thing you know, I'm going along based on this recollection, I >>> look up RFC 5952, and I notice there's now an "errata" associated with >>> it. Would that errata be about some grammatical minutiae? Nope. It's >>> specifically to switch back to upper case hex representation! >> there is a lesson here >> >> randy >> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list >> [email protected] >> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 >> -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > It is only "Reported". I would say that it needs to be moved to > "Rejected".
Obviously. An erratum that attempts to reverse a clear WG consensus that the person doesn't like is a misuse of the errata system. Brian -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
