Hi Ran, On 06/07/2012 12:18 PM, RJ Atkinson wrote: > > One (non-blocking) side comment to the discussion (contained > within "draft-dec-6man-rs-access-harmful") that IPv6 RS messages > are specified at present to avoid repetitive RS messages after > a host's initial (re)initialisation period might be worth repeating. > > On low bandwidth links (e.g. many commonly used radio links), > it is very important to keep the ND traffic low, so that the > link capacity can be used for actual user/data traffic. > > While it is great that some very recent IEEE 802.11 specifications > enable higher link capacity wireless LAN segments, there remain > many existing radio link technologies that are unlikely ever > to have higher link capacity. First-responder radios are especially > likely to have significantly constrained link capacity, for example.
While I fully agree with you, I am not sure how this applies to the lineid draft. Is there some specific change you would like to see in the draft? Thanks Suresh -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
