On 07/12/2012 06:34 PM, SM wrote:
Hi Simon,
At 12:47 12-07-2012, Simon Perreault wrote:
Suggestion:
On input, applications MUST accept the formal syntax and MAY accept
another syntax.
On output, applications MUST use the formal syntax and MUST NOT use
another syntax.
As long as an implementation supports the formal syntax, there is
interoperability. Telling people what not to use sounds appropriate if
there is a good reason to do so. The requirements seem redundant to me.
Have you heard of Postel's law?
(semi joking)
Simon
--
DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca
NAT64/DNS64 open-source --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
STUN/TURN server --> http://numb.viagenie.ca
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
