Brian, In the two plus weeks since you sent this, I saw one email in support and none is opposition. Given the lack of objections to publishing this as a Proposed Standard, I think OK to go forward as a PS.
Bob On Jul 9, 2012, at 5:36 PM, Brian Haberman wrote: > All, > During the IESG discussion of draft-ietf-6man-lineid, the question was > raised as to its appropriate status. The WG decided to advance the draft as > Experimental since it had documented limitations and was targeted to a > limited deployment scenario. Several ADs raised the issue that the above > reasons do not necessarily make the draft inappropriate for Proposed > Standard, To quote feedback from one of the ADs (Barry Leiba): > > > "If the limitations are clearly documented and if that document can be used > to target implementations correctly, then I think PS is completely > appropriate. If experimentation is needed to *determine* the limitations, or > to determine how to implement the specification to as not to interfere with > inapplicable situations, then Experimental is best." > > > In my view, there is a clear understanding of what the limitations of this > approach are and they can be clearly defined in an applicability statement > within the draft. Additionally, we know the deployment scenario (N:1 VLAN > usage in broadband networks) where this approach will be used. > > My question is whether there is opposition or support within the community to > move the document to Proposed Standard as long as there is a sufficient > applicability statement included in the draft. Please provide feedback to > the mailing list (and the cc:'ed ADs) on this proposed change. > > Regards, > Brian > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > [email protected] > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
