* Karl Auer

> - it is not explicit that the M and O flags are completely
> independent of each other. Common practice is to treat them as
> independent, and I can see no good reason to link them in the RFC or
> anywhere else.

RFC 4861 section 4.2 seems to me to be pretty clear about this:

«If the M flag is set, the O flag is redundant and can be ignored
because DHCPv6 will return all available configuration information.»

So the operational value of O is (M OR O), as I understand it.

Best regards,
-- 
Tore Anderson
Redpill Linpro AS - http://www.redpill-linpro.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to