At 09:09 06-08-2012, George, Wes wrote:
Question to the WG (and to Barry, given his recent guidance on Errata) - would it be appropriate to file an errata on 6547 noting the additional RFCs that it should be updating, is this a matter of issuing a 6547-bis, or does it simply not matter?
RFC 6547 moves RFC 3627 to Historic. I don't see any reason to reopen it with a -bis. Please see https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/rfc-metadata-errata.html
Regards, -sm -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
