I think this is an important change, and I think our work on the problem
side of the things underscores that.
As a contributor I am in favor of advancing this document.
That said I'd also like to hear from implementers that this is a
reasonable fix with few if any negative consequences (something I
believe to be the case).
joel
On 9/4/12 10:28 AM, Bob Hinden wrote:
All,
This message starts a two week 6MAN Working Group on advancing:
Title : Neighbor Unreachability Detection is too impatient
Author(s) : Erik Nordmark
Igor Gashinsky
Filename : draft-ietf-6man-impatient-nud-02.txt
Pages : 8
Date : 2012-07-31
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6man-impatient-nud-02
as Proposed Standard. Substantive comments and statements of support for
advancing this document should be directed to the mailing list. Editorial
suggestions can be sent to the authors. This last call will end on September
18, 2012.
Regards,
Ole Troan & Bob Hinden
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
