Mikael, am Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 10:08:39AM +0200 hast du folgendes geschrieben: > On Fri, 19 Oct 2012, Alexandru Petrescu wrote: > >Comments about the idea in this draft? About the problem? > What is the rationale for duplicating the functionality in DHCPv6-PD > into ND? If code needs to be changed, why can't that code change be > to implement existing standard instead of implementing a new > standard? > > Isn't ND handled by the kernel in a lot of OSes? Does prefix > delegation really belong there?
that reminds me of the RA/DHCPv6 for DNS recursor host configuration in RFC4339, which provides advantages/disadvantages for shipping this information by RDNSS vs. DHCPv6. Kind regards Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
