On 10/20/2012 9:36 AM, [email protected] wrote:
>> There is also the question of availability of DHCP software on smaller
>> platforms which have no SIM card. It may be easier to do this with ND
>> in smaller settings.
>
> The obvious conclusion to this argument is that a *lot* of DHCP
> functionality will be duplicated in ND. Is this where we want to go?
>
> I'm coming from the DHCP side of the argument. In my world DHCP is
> needed because it gives you a single place to handle dynamic address
> allocation, *and* it ties in with all sorts of support & backend
> systems.
>
> I am against adding lots of new ND functionality until we have DHCPv6
> that is considerably more feature complete. Some of this is probably
> coming (client MAC address), some of it is still being opposed for
> mostly religious reasons (e.g. running DHCP without RA).
>
> Steinar Haug, AS 2116
+1 on all counts.
Doug
--
I am only one, but I am one. I cannot do everything, but I can do
something. And I will not let what I cannot do interfere with what
I can do.
-- Edward Everett Hale, (1822 - 1909)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
