That is helpful. There's obviously a few details to be sorted in this rearrangement of text (and some other people's comments still to incorporate), we now need to affirm we are on the correct path. Magnus and I will liaise and work with the 6man chairs.
Thanks for the feedback, Gorry > Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-6man-udpzero-07: Discuss > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > DISCUSS: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > See my DISCUSS for draft-ietf-6man-udpchecksums: > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6man-udpchecksums/ballot/ > > Update for -07: > This is exactly what I had in mind. Assuming that the WG is happy with > this, when the corresponding changes are made to the udpchecksums doc my > concerns will be well addressed. > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > [email protected] > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
