On 30 Oct 2012, at 07:58, Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 29/10/2012 18:46, Ole Trøan wrote: >> All, >> >> there is a suggestion by our AD to move the 6man session from Monday morning >> to Tuesday morning. >> this is to allow Apps people to participate in the discussion on the URI >> draft. >> >> If anyone has strong objections to moving the session to Tuesday, please let >> us know. > > As Tim noted, the collision with IRTF/SDN is unfortunate, but also, I don't > see how we can deal with this in a 15 minute slot. The point is to discuss > an unknown objection with Apps people who have presumably not followed the > preceding discussion at all. Well, it's "unfortunate" in that I'd have to miss 6man, when I have an active draft being presented there. But I also have no idea how many other people are in my boat, or how many apps people want 6man moved. > If we get a written explanation of the objection in advance, we could have > a useful discussion in the time available. That sounds prudent. It's not like we have a whole subject area clash here, as would be the case with homenet and 6man, rather we seem to be proposing this significant schedule change that would put two of the biggest WG sessions in the same slot in order to allow people to take part in a 10-minute discussion (assuming it's draft-ietf-appsawg-acct-uri on the APPSAWG agenda)? Is it possible to schedule of individual items in each WG that people who want to pop to APPSAWG can do so for those 10 minutes? Tim -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
