Hi Erik, On 11/25/2012 11:43 PM, Erik Kline wrote: > Was there discussion of the status of this document in Atlanta, and I > just missed it?
You are right. There was no discussion of this at the Atlanta F2F meeting. > > One tweak I think the document might need is just a single-sentence > clarification that this does not modify the start-up randomization for > the first RS, vis. the MAX_RTR_SOLICITATION_DELAY (i.e. start-up > random delay still applies). Sounds good. Will do. > > I suppose whether or not this officially updates 4861 and/or becomes a > recommended modification to the node requirements doc will need to > wait for implementation feedback from the field. Personally, I believe this document updates 4861 and if the WG agrees, we can put in the Updates: tag into the draft. Seeing that ND fixes have usually been rolled into the node requirements updates, hopefully the next version (6434bis?) will pick this up. Thanks Suresh -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
