Hi Ole I read the texts you pointed to. I believe this inconvenience needs more systematical way to fix, which is beyond the scope of the draft.
Thanks Frank -----Original Message----- From: Ole Trøan [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2012 6:52 PM To: Xiayangsong Cc: Sheng Jiang; <[email protected]> WG; IPv6 List Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Review of draft "Prefix Assignment in DHCPv6" > - we shouldn't create new DHCPv6 options with T1/T2 timers. those should be > put in a separate option > Frank=>Please give me a link so that I could check the "SHOULDN'T" rule. wouldn't go as far as claiming it is a "SHOULD NOT". http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-issues-03#section-4.3 if we were to create new IA options I do think we should fix this though. preferably in rfc3315bis. cheers, Ole -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
