On 18/12/2012 14:40, Ole Troan wrote: >> The concern is that we are still mainly ignoring the renumbering >> problem, and in some years time this will be serious for users. >> But if you add "From the point of view of renumbering, these addresses >> behave like RFC4941 addresses" the point is covered. > > ... behave like RFC4862 addresses.
Yes, sorry, didn't put my brain on straight today. Brian -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
