Hi,
On 19.12.2012 14:21, Rémi Després wrote:
> Could we limit the 6man discussion to the question asked by Softwire,
> i.e. whether new IID types can be defined, using u=g=1, with a first
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Sorry, I'm not yet aware of a concept called IID _types_?
Do we really have such a thing "IID types"?
> If the answer is positive (as it seems it can be), restarting a
> discussion on the 4rd design is unnecessary. That is only if the
> answer is negative that Softwire will have to restart working on the
> subject.
Obviously, this question has further implications, so I
think it's legitimate to ask whether the proposed solution
is really a reasonable way of solving the problem.
Regards,
Roland
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
